Federal criminal defense attorney

Criminal Defense Advice
By Steve Valentino

Criminal defense advice is counseling given by criminal defense lawyers or attorneys that help resolve legal issues. Criminal defense advisors are experts in criminal law who will be able to provide thorough and competent legal representation to the accused. They provide services to the accused in every stage, from arrest to trial and to appeal. Criminal defense advisors will also be able to explain weak points to the prosecutor concerning the case after studying it thoroughly and reviewing the facts. They will also provide information on the probability of success and the requirements needed to fight the case. They will be able to provide all the information on criminal justice procedure in each and every stage of the case. They will also be able to explain in detail the rights and possible legal consequences of different criminal behavior. The criminal defense lawyer will teach what the accused can do in certain cases.

Criminal defense advice can be about DUI, DWI, assault, disorderly conduct, kidnapping, domestic violence, embezzlement, felonies, hit and run, murder, parole violations, bench warrants or arrest warrants, bail hearings, administrative hearings, summonses, and more.

There are a lot of legal organizations that provide criminal defense advice throughout the country. Criminal defense advice can also be received on the Internet. Some not-for-profit legal organizations and bar associations offer free criminal defense advice. They will be able to find the best possible solution depending upon the client?s problem. However, before approaching an attorney for legal assistance, it is advisable to do research on the chosen criminal defense lawyer?s certification, specialization, state bar records, credentials, ratings, years of experience, and verdicts and settlements. The Internet would be the best source to search for a qualified and experienced criminal defense lawyer. Attorney Search Network will help one find criminal defense lawyers and attorneys in any locality.

Criminal Defense provides detailed information on Criminal Defense, Criminal Defense Attorneys, White Collar Criminal Defense, Criminal Defense Law and more. Criminal Defense is affiliated with San Diego Dui Laws.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Steve_Valentino
http://EzineArticles.com/?Criminal-Defense-Advice&id=354283

Tucson Criminal Defense Lawyer Facts for Juvenile Offenders
By Kevin Mitzner

The following are situations in which you might need to get a lawyer when you are in Tucson, though it would be for anyone s best interest if you do not get into such situations. But if you do need to have one, circumstances as the ones below may be enough for you to hire the services of a lawyer.

A juvenile offender

When a juvenile has committed a crime, the attorney of the county will then need to bring in a criminal type of prosecution against such a juvenile in a similar manner as when it is an adult that has committed such a crime. The age of the juvenile, either if such is seventeen, sixteen or fifteen, is irrelevant as long as the offenses fall on the following: murder in the first degree (violating sec 13-1105), murder in the second degree (violating sec 13-1104), forced sexual assault (violating sec 13-1406), robbery with arms (violating sec 13-1904), or any other offense felony that is violent.

Another situation where the above case applies when the following situations arise: a felony that is classified as class 1, a felony that is classified as class 2, a felony that is classified as class 3 that is in direct violation of any of the offense indicated through chapters 1 up until chapter 17, or chapter 23 or 19.

A felony that is classified as class 3 that is in any way violating an offense in chapters 10 up until chapter 17 or chapter 23 or 19 is also subject for a criminal prosecution.

Also included in the above charge are the following felony: class 3 up until 6. These all involve the inflicting - with intention - of an injury that is serious and at the same time physical, as well as the willful discharge or an exhibition of a weapon that is deadly and dangerous.

Another case is when an offense is committed a felony chronically and therefore is considered an offender. Another offense is one that is joined properly to another offense that is included in this particular subsection.

Another situation wherein a criminal prosecution is to be brought up to a juvenile the same way if the offender is an adult, is when the mentioned juvenile is accused of committing an offense that is considered criminal and there exists a historical proof of the conviction.

After such procedures, the court that is specially intended to try juveniles shall then have a hearing after an arraignment and just before a trial in order to know if a particular juvenile is an offender of felony chronically.

It is during the hearing that the State of Tucson shall then prove via a preponderance of the available evidence that a particular juvenile is a chronic offender. If it exists that a particular juvenile is not such, the court will then have to transfer the juvenile to the juvenile court as according to sec 8-302.

However, if the court then sees enough evidence to prove that the juvenile has indeed been a felony-chronic offender, and if the juvenile did not in any way file a particular motion that will determine if the juvenile is a chronic offender, the prosecution shall then have to go on.

All in all, a criminal defense lawyer will do best to guide one through the process of such a procedure when in Tucson.

CriminalDefenseFAQS.com provides *straight to the point* articles about Criminal Defense Lawyer, Federal Criminal Defense and Criminal Defense Investigator.
If you need more information, please visit Criminal Defense Faqs.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Kevin_Mitzner
http://EzineArticles.com/?Tucson-Criminal-Defense-Lawyer-Facts-for-Juvenile-Offenders&id=236017

Criminal Law: A Critical Analysis of the Magistrate Court
By Thomas Gallagher

Introduction

The Magistrates’ Courts play an extremely important role inside the criminal justice system within the United Kingdom. This brief article will assess the functions of the magistrates’ court and evaluate the effectiveness of having a mechanism for determining the guilt of a defendant based solely on the discretion of the magistrates present. Before assessing the origins of the magistrate court, there will be a brief examination of what a magistrate is and what their functions are. Following from this, a brief insight into the origins of the magistrate court will be given, as it is important to understand the origins of any system as this will inform the reader of the initiative behind the original concept. After discussing the origins of the system, the procedure of appointment will then be discussed. This process will then be examined when the analysis is focused upon the procedures contained within the Magistrate court for assessing the guilt of a defendant. As a defendant will be denied a trail by jury, the system in place for the appointment of these magistrates is of paramount importance, as all individuals must be judged by their peers. If, after considering the evidence, the current system is deemed to be defective, then possible solutions will be considered to improve the present situation. The article will conclude that although the current system is far from perfect, it serves as a significant filter for more serious crimes which are tried in the Crown Court by a jury.

What is a Magistrate?

In the courts of England and Wales, it is the function of a magistrate to hear prosecutions for summary offences. They have the power to make orders in regard to and placing additional requirements on offenders. Magistrates sentencing powers are limited compared to that of the Crown Court (See Criminal Law: A Critical Analysis of the Crown Court), extending to shorter periods of custody, fines, probation and community service orders, and a miscellany of other options. Magistrates hear committal proceedings for indictable offences, and establish whether sufficient evidence exists to pass the case to a higher court for trial and sentencing. Magistrates have power to pass summary offenders to higher courts for sentencing when, in the opinion of the magistrate, a penalty greater than can be given in magistrates court is warranted. The function of a magistrate is of great importance, but where did they originally come from?

Origins of the Magistrate Court

The origins of the magistrate system can be seen to have been initiated in the 12th century. Richard I (Richard the Lion heart) commissioned certain knights in England to keep the Kings peace in unruly areas. By the 14th century, a new phrase had been coined to describe individuals who had accepted the responsibility of keeping the peace. The title Justices of the Peace was initiated during the reign of Edward III and referred to good and lawful men to be appointed in every county to guard the peace’. The magistrate system has evolved since its early inception and now deals with over 95% of all prosecuted crime and is responsible for handing out over

Oklahoma Criminal Records
By Jennifer Bailey

Among the different states in the U.S. there are some states that make it a point to provide their citizens with a wide selection of sources from which their citizens can again access to information on criminal records. Usually, these states do so because of the large number of rims and individuals who need this kind of information. One good example of such a state is California, wherein the people of California can expect to have at least three sources of criminal records from state authorities. As a result, the people of California are given convenient and practical ways to access the criminal records of people. Another very good example of such as state is Oklahoma, as the people of Oklahoma are also provided with at least three sources of information on criminal records.

Sources of information on criminal records in Oklahoma

One very good source of information on criminal records in Oklahoma is the web site of the Ohio Department of Corrections (www.doc.state.ok.us) where people can gain access to two offender information databases. These two databases include the database that contain information on habitual and aggravated sex offenders and the database on other current and former inmates of the state. The usual information provided by these databases include the name of the offender, his physical description, his sentence information, and the facility where he is incarcerated. Another good source of information on criminal records in Oklahoma is the web site of the Oklahoma District Court Records (www.odcr.com) where people are given access to both criminal and civil cases information, which include the names of the parties, the status of the case, and the date the case was filed.

Another good source of criminal records in Oklahoma is the web site of the Oklahoma State Courts Network (www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/casesearch.asp), where information on criminal, civil, probate, traffic, and other cases are provided to the public. In addition to these, information on licenses and tax liens is also provided on this web site.

Across the different states in the U.S., Oklahoma is a good example of a state that offers its citizens with a wide selection of sources of information on criminal records, which people can access for various reasons. This is because the state government of the state together with other state authorities, which includes the judiciary provide the citizens of Oklahoma at least three sources, especially on the Internet, of information on criminal records.

Criminal Records provides detailed information on Criminal Court Records, Criminal Records, Criminal Records Online, Criminal Records Search and more. Criminal Records is affiliated with Masters Degree In Criminal Justice.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Jennifer_Bailey
http://EzineArticles.com/?Oklahoma-Criminal-Records&id=410109

Criminal Defense Attorneys - Non-Profit
By Micheal Kennedy

The mission of a non-profit criminal defense lawyer organization is to ensure the right of the people being accused of an offense are maintained. Legal support and education are provided on an ongoing basis focusing on the rights of the citizens. The personnel are available to assist with the legal process and represent the accused as a criminal defense practitioner.

The criminal defense attorneys provided by the non-profit organization are skilled, competent, insured, and knowledgeable on any legal matter. They will be able to answer any of your questions and ensure that the defendant is treated with fairness and equality. Charges ranging from drunk driving, possession of illegal drugs, domestic violence, theft, and more can all be handled by a non-profit criminal defense attorney.

Free consultations are provided even for crimes of driving under the influence, assault, murder, homicide, drug offenses and other serious crimes. So often innocent people are put in jail for crimes they did not commit. This can be a very devastating and life changing event if this occurs. Local criminal defense laywers are responsible for protecting those citizens that are accused of crimes but may not be able to afford the legal fees to defense their position.

The laywers available are excellent at developing defense strategies for very complex cases. Their role is to protect the rights of their client and ensure that they have exceptional courtroom reputation to achieve the best results for every given case. They will handle most of the federal and state crimes, even sexual and drug offenses.

Mike Sherbert owns and operates http://www.your-criminal-defense-lawyer.info
See Here For More Criminal Defense Information

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Micheal_Kennedy
http://EzineArticles.com/?Criminal-Defense-Attorneys—Non-Profit&id=601885

Criminal Defense Law
By Steve Valentino

What is the law regarding criminal defense? The justice system in the country takes innocence for granted. It is up to the jury to prove the accused guilty “beyond reasonable doubt”. The state provides all possible resources for every accused to prove his innocence, because, all said and done, criminal prosecution is an onerous and expensive process.

It is only when the state has a very strong case that it is necessary to have a strong criminal defense. Is it paying for lawyers to practice criminal defense? Not really, though some have made a career of it. Because, all said and done, the state does line up its best against criminal defense lawyers. Yes, this could sometimes mean that criminal defense law could be a paying proposition if the lawyers charged the poor defendants to stand firm against the might of the state. But in more cases than not, the criminal defense lawyer has to match the vast resources of the state with little or no resources of his own.

However, in most cases, criminal defense law comes into play and a balance against the prosecution of any individual, so justice is ensured. It is every free person’s right to have recourse to a defendant if he is accused of a crime. Two-thirds of defendants in the latter part of the 20th century were defended by public defendants. Very often, lawyers are required by the courts or their bar associations to defend criminals for free! Little wonder a lot of them make less than maybe masons or plumbers!

Criminal Defense provides detailed information on Criminal Defense, Criminal Defense Attorneys, White Collar Criminal Defense, Criminal Defense Law and more. Criminal Defense is affiliated with San Diego Dui Laws.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Steve_Valentino
http://EzineArticles.com/?Criminal-Defense-Law&id=271987

Criminal Files — Recording Those Who Have Broken the Law
By Amit Mehta

Criminal files are the records of any criminal activity that someone has engaged in and may have been prosecuted or convicted for. Since criminal records are considered public records, these are readily available to people who wish to conduct background checks for one reason or the other. Criminal documents, compared to civil court files, definitely bear more weight when it comes to the assessment of an individual and his or her character.

If you have been convicted before, you may want to access your own criminal files before a potential business partner or employer gets to them. It is best to come prepared by familiarizing yourself with the contents of the criminal file and work on having them permanently closed, especially if charges have been dropped or dismissed.

You need to file a formal request for the closure of criminal files at least one month after they have been made, but even then, only the fingerprints, photographs and sections of the file will be destroyed. An occurrence report of criminal records is typically maintained by the registrar or by the county court even after closure for record keeping purposes.

Online Access to Criminal Records - Evaluating the Pros and Cons

Quite a number of companies are now offering access to criminal documents online, giving the general public a comprehensive search of different kinds of criminal files. These include federal fugitive files, probation records, prison parole files and searches that include both state and county repositories for criminal records.

Remote access to criminal files allows you to retrieve the information by demand, whenever the situation calls for it. Employers will be able to make quick hiring decisions and businesses will be able to decide on partnerships and joint ventures without doubting the credibility of their associates.

There are disadvantages though. Cases of identity theft can proliferate and some people may use the information obtained through criminal files for blackmail or other unscrupulous reasons. The contents of these documents may also be used in influencing decisions of defendants and witnesses in ongoing criminal proceedings.

While knowledge is control, it is the responsibility of your state to ensure that criminal files are accessed for the primary intent of protecting its citizens. They need to make sure that sealed documents remain confidential except in situations where it is justified that they are released. Pretrial and pre-sentence investigations are also to be withheld from the public until they have progressed to actual legal proceedings.

But the disadvantages that remote access may bring about are still outweighed by the advantages. Tracking cases become easier since even judges and lawyers can access these criminal records online and the clerk s office is freed from the burden of numerous requests.

If there are any mistakes in criminal files, it becomes much easier to know about them and correct them accordingly. Even wrongful prosecutions and cases involving bribery and favoritism can be tracked using remote access to criminal files. Finally, this reinforces the open nature of public records and the legal system by allowing access to criminal files on the Internet.

Want to Know the Top Sites to Find Criminal Files? Read Dr. Amit Mehta s Unbiased Reviews ==> RecordsSiteReviews.com

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Amit_Mehta
http://EzineArticles.com/?Criminal-Files—-Recording-Those-Who-Have-Broken-the-Law&id=306378

Should Criminal Trials Have a Lay Jury?
By Eric Hartwell

The whole question as to whether criminal trials should be decided upon via a layman jury has come to the fore once again. A case in the U.K. where a young boy died with five times the normal levels of salt in his blood has highlighted a difficult problem.

The two adults who were attempting to adopt him were accused of manslaughter and, basically, of force feeding him salt. They won an appeal in the British courts which was presided over by a judge and a jury.

However, the case revolved around the possibility that this young boy who died suffered from a rare and complex medical condition and the case was argued for and against via the use of expert medical witnesses who attempted to provide an up-to-date record of current evidence, research, and knowledge.

But how can a jury of normal human beings decide on a case which is filled with such complexity and which, in addition, could only be descriptively analyzed and contested by advanced medical brains? This begs the question as to whether juries should be made up of expert observers but less, in turn, will it raise the difficulty in actually getting experts on a regular enough basis to sit through lengthy complex trials.

The other alternative is to have juries sitting and deciding on the outcome of a case but with access to a “friend” in the guise of an expert witness chosen or agreed by both prosecution and defense. Whilst this might be useful and advisory in complex cases, for instance complex fraud cases, it is far from ideal and brings its own difficulties and assumptions.

Eric Hartwell oversees “The World s Best Homepage” intended to be a user-generated resource where YOUR opinion counts. Anybody can contribute and all are welcomed. Visit us to read, comment upon or share opinions at the worlds best homepage or submit or use content at free content resource.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Eric_Hartwell
http://EzineArticles.com/?Should-Criminal-Trials-Have-a-Lay-Jury?&id=488235

Criminal Misdemeanor Law in Rhode Island (RI) - Plea Agreements - Sentencing & What is a Conviction?
By David Slepkow

This article explains pleas and sentencing in Rhode Island (RI) for criminal misdemeanors. If you are charged with a misdemeanor crime in Rhode Island you should read this legal article very carefully. However, do not use this article as a substitute for seeking independent legal advice from a lawyer. This article was written by attorney, David Slepkow 401-437-1100.

A misdemeanor is any offense punishable by up to one year in Jail. Typical misdemeanors are: driving under the influence of alcohol (dui / dwi), shoplifting, domestic assault, Second (2nd) offense refusal to take the breathalyzer, driving on a suspended license, writing bad checks, domestic vandalism, simple assault and battery, domestic disorderly, reckless driving, disorderly conduct, etc. There are different rules that apply to driving with suspended licenses and this article does not fully address those provisions.

It is a very bad idea for a person to represent themselves (pro-se) in a criminal case. Please note that this article only applies to Rhode Island misdemeanor offenses and does not apply to any other states!

At the arraignment, A person should almost always say not guilty and hire an attorney. If a person cannot afford a lawyer then the person should go to the Public Defender. After the arraignment the matter will be set for a pretrial conference a couple of weeks later. In some very limited circumstances a person can work out a plea deal at the arraignment. It is usually a very bad idea for a person to enter into a plea agreement without an attorney.

At the pretrial conference a person can change their plea after meeting with the prosecutor and or the judge and after finding out what the prosecutor is offering for a a sentence. A defendant can negotiate with the prosecutor through their lawyer. If a plea agreement cannot be worked out at the pretrial conferences the matter will be set for trial. The matter also could be scheduled for motions prior to the trial if motions are requested.

A person should never change their plea from not guilty to nolo contendere or guilty without a plea deal from the prosecutor.

In Rhode Island, a defendant can enter one of four pleas: guilty, not guilty, nolo contendere or an “alfred plea”.

Guilty and Not Guilty Pleas

The pleas of guilty and not guilty are obvious. If the plea is not guilty then the matter will be scheduled for a trial on the merits in which the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the person is guilty of the alleged offense. The person will be presumed innocent and it is the prosecutions burden to prove that the person is guilty. Usually, it is a very very bad idea to take a guilty plea! Guilty pleas or a finding of guilt after a trial is always a criminal conviction in Rhode Island.

Nolo Contendere Plea

Nolo contendere means a person is not contesting the charges. When a defendant takes a nolo contendere plea in Rhode island, the defendant is indicting that he does not want to contest the charges but is also essentially admitting to the charges.

What is the difference between a guilty plea and a nolo contendere plea in rhode Island? There is a huge difference! A guilty plea is always a criminal conviction under Rhode Island law. A criminal conviction has major negative implications especially when a person applies for employment. A plea of nolo contendere may not constitute a criminal conviction in Rhode Island. A plea of nolo contendere is only a conviction in Rhode Island if there is a sentence of confinement (such as the ACI or home confinement), a suspended sentence or a fine imposed.

For example, A plea of nolo contendere with a sentence of probation and a contribution to the violent crimes indemnity fund or court costs will not constitute a conviction under Rhode Island law! For example, A plea of nolo contendere with a sentence of a filing and a contribution to the violent crimes indemnity fund (vcif) will not constitute a conviction under Rhode Island law.

However, anything with a fine attached to it will be a conviction under Rhode Island law. Therefore, it is important that the defendant gets either no fine or a contribution to the victims fund or court costs rather then a fine.

All misdeameanor plea agreements in Rhode lsland should be nolo contendere with court costs or a contribution towards the victims indemnity fund rather then guilty pleas!

Alfred Pleas

Alfred Pleas are strongly disfavored by judges in Rhode Island (RI) and are difficult to get. Alfred pleas derive from a United States Supreme Court case. In an Alfred plea, a defendant will admit that the state has sufficient evidence to convict him or her if the case went to trial but will not admit to anything.

DUI / Drunk Driving charges

In Rhode Island, any plea to drunk driving, driving under the influence, DUI/ DWI is a conviction under Rhode Island law. A breathalyzer refusal plea of guilty or “admitting to sufficient facts” is not a criminal conviction because a breathalyzer refusal is a civil case. For more information concerning Rhode Island drunk driving / dui and breathalyzer refusal law please see =>http://ezinearticles.com/?Rhode-Island-DUI—DWI-Law-Should-I-Refuse-The-Breathalyzer?&ampid=486659

Guilty Finding after Trial and appeals de novo

If the defendant is found guilty after trial the sentence will constitute a conviction. If a person is found guilty at trial in district court they can appeal de novo (of new) to the Superior Court and the conviction will be erased and the case will essentially start all over again in the Superior Court.

Obviously, the defendants best result is either a dismissal by the prosecution or an acquittal.
A defendant has five days to file an appeal of a guilty finding after trial or appeal a plea agreement that he / she is unhappy with. In the Superior Court appeal, the defendant has a right to a trial by jury. Whereas, in The District Court a person waives their right to a trial by jury but in exchange for their waiver of their right to a trial by jury has the right to appeal any guilty finding de novo (of new) to the Superior Court. A person charged with a misdemeanor essentially has two bites of the apple so to speak. A defendant can attempt to win at a judge decided trial in District Court and then if they lose they can do it all over again with a jury trial in Superior Court.

What is a “filing” in Rhode Island?

If the defendant takes a not guilty plea or a nolo contendere plea then the case will be “filed” for a year. This is commonly called a “filing”. If the defendant does not get arrested or get in other trouble and complies with the conditions of the filing during the one year period then the case is dismissed and can be easily expunged from a person s record after the year.

What types of filing are there in Rhode Island

There are two types of filings, not guilty filings and nolo contendere filings. A not Guilty filing is when the defendant maintains his innocence and the case if filed for a year. A not guilty filing is not usually allowed by Judges in the District Court. Not Guilty filings are extremely rare in the District Court. Some judges will not allow not guilty filings as a matter of policy. Not guilty filings are very beneficial to the defendant as the best case scenario short of a dismissal or not guilty finding because if the person is accused of a new crime or violating their filing the state will need to still prove their underlying case.

A nolo contendere filing is when the defendant admits to guilt and the case is filed for a year. The vast majority of filings are nolo contedere filings! A major difference between a not guilty filing and a nolo contendere filing is when a person is violated for a not guilty filing then the state / prosecution must prove guilt at that time. Whereas, if a person is violated for a nolo contendere filing, the judge simply must impose a sentence because the person has already admitted guilt to that offense.

If the person violates his filing by not complying with the conditions of the filing then the persons filing can be revoked by the Court. If a person takes a nolo contendere filing and gets into further trouble, violates the conditions of the filing or is arrested on a new offense then the person will be hailed back into court to be sentenced on the filing. (unless the filing was a not guilty filing which means the prosecution must prove the defendants guilt) There are various conditions that can be put on a filing inluding alcohol and drug counseling, domestic violence counseling or classes, restitution, no contact with the victim and community service.

What implications are there for domestic violence offenses in Rhode Island?

If the underlying charge is for a domestic offense such as domestic assault / domestic vandalism or domestic disorderly conduct then the defendant will be ordered to have no contact with his wife girlfriend or the victim as the case may be. If the defendant violates the no contact order then the defendant will be charged with a separate offense of violating a no contact order as well as violating the conditions of the filing or probation, as a result of the communication.

No Contact Orders in Rhode Island explained

A “no contact order” means that the defendant is precluded from having any contact and or communication with the victim or the person under the protection of the no contact order. This includes but is not limited to letters, emails, text messages or messages delivered through a third party.

In other words if a person is under a no contact order and sees the victim in public they must leave the area immediately and not acknowledge the victims existence. A person cannot even say “hi” if they walk by the victim by chance on the street.

Be very careful! A person can be arrested for violating a no contact order even if the victim initiates the contact and calls the defedant. A person can be charged with breaking a no contact order even if invited by his wife to come back to the marital home.

Even if the victim tells you that the no contact order has been dropped, do not take the victims word for it. You must see the piece of paper signed by the judge dismissing the no contact order before any contact or communication is initiated. A no contact order expires when the sentence period is finished. However, be careful because there may also be a restraining order issued as a reult of a divorce or family court matter or a District Court restraining order.

A person who is on probation or a probation attached to a suspended sentence must be even more vigilante in order to not violate the no contact order. For example, a single phone call made by the defendant to a victim under the protection of a no contact order probably means a minimum of ten 10 days in jail at the ACI. We are not talking about the local town jail but the ACI.

Violation of conditions of filing

Please note, that a person who has a filing can be held for up to ten days at the ACI if arrested for a new charge / crime. A person who is on a filing must be very careful that he / she stays out of troubl.

If the person is violated from the terms and conditions of the filing then hypothetically the filing could become a conviction because that person has already admitted to the charges by pleading nolo contendere and giving up his right to contest the charges. Court costs will be imposed if there is a nolo contendere filing in a criminal case.

Probation in Rhode Island

If a person recieves probation then they will need to abide by the conditions of the probation and agree to keep the peace and be of good behavior. If a person violates his probation by being arrested for a new crime then the person may be held in Jail at the ACI as a probation violater. After ten days a person has the right to a hearing. At the probation violation hearing, the prosecutor must only convince the judge so that the judge is “reasonably satisfied” that the person violated the probation by committing the new offense. Also the person will be prosecuted for the new offense as a separate charge from violating the probation. There is a good chance that if a person is violated for his probation that the probation which was originally not a conviction will now ripen into a conviction.

A probationary period is a time of great risk for a defendant and a defendant must be careful to stay out of trouble!

A person can also be violated for his probation for various infractions that may not be criminal acts but that violate the conditions of probation such as not keeping probation informed of new adresses, leaving the state without permission, not paying court costs or restitution, not properly reporting to the probation officer, etc. When a person is under probation in Rhode Island he or she is essentially is in a contract with the state to keep the peace, be of good behavior and comply with the conditions and rules of probation.

What is a probation with a suspended sentence in Rhode Island?

If the charges are serious or the person has a lengthy criminal record of has already been placed on probation before then in addition to the probation, the judge may attach a suspended sentence. A person who has a suspended sentence is in a period of extreme risk because a new offense could lead to substantial jail time!

A suspended sentence is always a conviction under Rhode Island law. A person with probation and a suspended sentence attached will not spend anytime in prison unless the person violates the conditions of his probation as set forth above.

The period of the suspended sentence is the most time that a person could spend in prison if the person violates the conditions of the probation or commits a new offense. If the person violates the probation, the judge could sentence the person up to the amount of time that is suspended. Please note that the person could get additional sentence and or penalties as a result of the new charge. It is in the defendants best interest to have the period of suspended sentence to be as short as possible. The suspended sentence typically is for the same amount of time as the period of probation.

Please note that if the offense is driving on a suspended license there are special rules that apply that are set forth in the statutes.

Most prosecutors and judges believe that each sentence should be more severe then the last. A person s first minor offense is likely to lead to only a filing which is the lowest form of penalty in Rhode Island. A person usually will only be allowed one filing.

It is important that this criminal law article be used for informational purposes only and not as a substitute for seeking legal advice from a Rhode Island lawyer.

Rhode Island criminal, dui, divorce, family law, and personal injury law lawyer, David Slepkow has been practicing law for ten years. You can contact David at http://www.slepkowlaw.com or by calling him at 401-437-1100. David Slepkow is a lawyer and partner at Slepkow Slepkow & Associates, Inc. in East providence, Rhode Island. Slepkow Slepkow & Associates, Inc. was established in 1932 and is currently celebrating its 75th anniversary! Attorney, David Slepkow is a member of the Rhode Island (RI) and Massachusetts (MA) Bar Association. David offers free initial consultations and accepts all major credit cards. If necessary, David can arrange weekend and evening consults. David never charges any fee for personal injury case, automobile / auto/ car accidents and slip & fall cases unless sucessfull. David Slepkow is a member of the Family Law Inns of Court and the Rhode Island Trial Lawyers Association. David Practices in the following areas of law: criminal law, DUI & Breathalyzer refusal, divorce & personal injury.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=David_Slepkow
http://EzineArticles.com/?Criminal-Misdemeanor-Law-in-Rhode-Island-(RI)—Plea-Agreements—Sentencing-and-What-is-a-Conviction?&id=519372

Criminal Law: Are Gun Related Offences on the Increase?
By Thomas Gallagher

Introduction

The issue of guns being used for criminal purposes is not new to society and have been used since there invention by both criminals and law abiding citizens alike. There has been, however, an alarming increase within the United Kingdom were guns have been used during criminal offences. As stated before, guns have always been available to the criminal fraternity, so why has there been a sudden increase in their use within the United Kingdom. This article will assess the whether there has been an explosion of gun crime in the United Kingdom over the past two decades. The facts and figures that support the assertion that gun crime is on the increase will need to be examined first. There are many sources which have released conflicting statistics regarding the escalation of guns used in criminal activities. If the general overall perception is that gun crime is on the increase, the factors for this belief will be assessed next. There are the obvious sociological implications regarding why gun crime has exploded, however, is this rise due to the fact that guns are easier to get hold of in today’s society. Evidence supporting this assertion will be considered. Finally, if gun crime is on the increase, the possible solutions of curtailing this trend will be considered. This article will conclude that in relation to public perceptions, statistics do not matter. The state of affairs regarding the rise in gun crime is played out in the media by those with hidden agendas, those who have a vested interest in giving police more powers to carry guns, and of course, those who wish to sell more papers.

Figures Don’t Lie but Liars Can Figure

There are many sources that state that gun crime in the United Kingdom is spiralling out of control. Some terrifying statements have been made regarding the use of guns in today’s society. Indeed, David Bamber has claimed that gun crime has trebled as weapons and drugs flood British cities (Home Affairs Correspondent Filed: 24/02/2002). An independent report by Illegal Firearms in the UK, (Centre for Defence Studies at King s College in London) states that handguns were used in 3,685 offences last year compared with 2,648 in1997, an increase of 40 per cent. These statistics are pretty intimidating. If anybody was taking these two sources of information literally, anybody would think that we are living in a lawless society. Are these statistics a true reflection of the state of affairs regarding gun crime within the United Kingdom? Gun crime, according to the Home office has risen 3% in the last year, and this has followed a 2% rise from the previous year. Nevertheless, there has been a 15% reduction in the death rate for gun related crime. Indeed, Hazel Blears Home office and MP for Salford has stated that crime has fallen for the last 20 years with people less likely to be a victim of crime than 20 years ago. It is possible to deduce from these figures that there is a slight rise in gun crime. Gun ownership is tightly controlled in the UK, but anyone reading the newspapers or watching TV would think that the streets were full of gun-toting criminals. The overall level of gun crime remains low, but it is certainly true that in some areas guns are a feature of everyday life, and that over the last four years crime involving the use of some kind of gun has been on the increase.What are the possible explanations for this?

Sociological Explanations for the Rise in Gun Crime

Crime has always had a symbiotic relationship with crime. It seems that one cannot exist without the other. This does not explain, however, the rise in gun crime. As stated earlier, guns have been available in one form or another for centuries, so why is it only now that society is experiencing a rise in gun crime. According to Newsarchive 4 gun crime is mainly concentrated in three areas these areas are Metropolitan area, Greater Manchester and the West Midlands. In Merseyside there were 57 shootings during the 12 months to last December 2003 compared with 15 in the same period the year before. Greater Manchester also recorded a 23 per cent increase in gun crime and there have been rises in Nottinghamshire, Avon and Somerset, West Yorkshire and the Northumbria Police area which covers Newcastle. There are many who have opinions as to why gun crime has escalated. Singer and campaigner Mica Paris asserts that it is the feeling of exclusion that compels people in society to indulge in criminality and carry guns. The question remains as to whether guns are now easier to come by? Detectives in London have asserted that the illegal importation of guns started after the end of the Bosnia conflict and that they are changing hands for as little as